Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Felton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Closed by nominator

Camille Felton[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, there is apparently a french article which I believe to about the same person which is unsourced as well. I'm removing the biography section for now as it's a BLP that wholly unsourced other than a link to a IMDB article. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:35, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - See comment below. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 07:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Arr4 (talk) 07:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - I added a couple sources to get started. She's not hugely notable but seems to have had enough roles to meet GNG and is decently known in Quebec. —Мандичка^YO 😜 07:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - While the effort is appreciate those two references are basic press releases and basically blog sites and questionably notable. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:01, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've also added a newspaper article, focused on her, called "The Camille Felton Effect." —Мандичка^YO 😜 08:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep After looking at news sites there are many references to this person in independent writings. Removing content and then nominating for deletion is inappropriate as it makes the article look much weaker than it was before. Anyway I have restored the biography and added more references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:22, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination and comment Due to the efforts of the above editors I am withdrawing my nomination and requesting a speedy close. Also, it wasn't my intent to be inappropriate in removing a section of the article and then nominating it. That original section was a copyvio and needed to be blanked. From there I was unable to find more sources at which time I nominated. Cheers. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:32, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.