Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Anderson 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mangojuice^talk 15:26, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Camille Anderson

Based on precedent that WWE Diva Search contestants are usually not considered notable. Examples: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Renosecond 23:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep looks notable beyond her WWE affiliation. Might I add that it's been less than a month since the first AfD discussion on this article, which I feel is too soon to be renominating. VegaDark 01:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Having bit parts in a few movies and being in a few magazines doesn't make her much more notable (if that) than anyone else, and with the 6 articles/examples I have shown, some of them had more creditentials than she did and were still deleted. It is not too soon to renominate, based on the examples and precedents set by those listed above. And some of the other WWE Diva Search contestants are also protected and speedied. Renosecond 03:56, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. She seems to have been in more than enough to be notable. Not every diva search contestant must be gone, just because the others aren't notable. RobJ1981 21:18, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Not just a WWE Diva contestant. Had several bit parts in some TV programs. I even saw her on Filter if that counts for something. --Howard the Duck 13:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.