Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camdy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Camdy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSOFT. I could not find coverage of Camdy in any reliable sources. The sources provided in the article are all WP:SELFPUB. Sunmist3 (talk) 13:27, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Sunmist3 (talk) 13:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG for lack of available sources.- Mr X 13:56, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - is a good example of why software should be included in the A7 speedy deletion criteria. Even before the promotional material was moved there was not even a claim of notability. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 04:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Dialectric (talk) 15:39, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.