Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cambodia–Spain relations

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 03:12, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cambodia–Spain relations[edit]

Cambodia–Spain relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another article almost entirely based on the primary source of the Spanish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. These relations lack third party coverage to meet GNG. Most of their interactions are in multilateral forums. No embassies, agreements or state visits which would add to notability. LibStar (talk) 01:30, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Another one? Are you %!>}¥ kidding me? RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 09:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Foreign relations of Cambodia, I think this is a better move for all these little articles that aren't well developed or not significant. Dr vulpes (Talk) 03:00, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- Yet another example of a standalone article being created for every combination of two nations, no matter how insignificant their connexion may be. The subject is not encyclopaedic, the sources presented are all WP:PRIMARY (government press), and there is no secondary analysis, depth or other indication of notability. I can find no scholarly treatment of this relationship nor mentions in reputable journals. Merging to one or both countries' articles might be possible, but I can find no info particularly worth merging and no sourcing on which to base such a merge. Redir begs the question of which country to redirect towards (and do we really expect this as a search string?). Cheers, Last1in (talk) 13:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.