Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calysto Communications

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 00:34, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Calysto Communications[edit]

Calysto Communications (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

15-person PR agency with no particular claim to notability. Sources include press releases and broken links. Some searching around does not reveal two in-depth profile stories as required by WP:CORP CorporateM (Talk) 04:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 04:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -Fimatic (talk | contribs) 04:30, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:41, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable public relations firm. No significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources as required by the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG, nor in-depth profiles mentioned above per WP:ORG. The working links in the footnotes appear to be press releases. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:10, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. No reliable sources evidencing notability. — Joaquin008 (talk) 16:31, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.