Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvin College and Theological Seminary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, meaning not delete. Merging is at editors' discretion. --PeaceNT (talk) 05:26, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Calvin_College_and_Theological_Seminary[edit]

Obsolete. No Content. Already separate pages for Calvin College and Calvin Theological Seminary. Bad geocode location too.

Comment-there is a merge tag already in place, no reason to call for AfD, either keep the merge open or redirect the article to the suggested merge articles.--S_RX 22:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:02, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as rock solid notable. As said above, this AfD is quite the wrong method to deal with a merge discussion. The two component articles have significant overlap in their history sections and the merge discussion needs to agree a way forward. It is not necessarily best to merge this page. One way would be to keep this page as a coordinating article to cover the joint history up to 1991 and the reasons for the split. The two component pages can then concentrate on matters singular to their respective bodies. Anyway, I digress since this is not the place for such merge arguments :-) TerriersFan (talk) 02:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as wrong location for page. This isn't really AfD material, though. CRGreathouse (t | c) 13:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable historical institution. --Eastmain (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is not an issue, but the article needs references. Ecoleetage (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per TerriersFan the notability of this is not at issue. RFerreira (talk) 19:44, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.