Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call Me Beta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. A7 — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Call Me Beta[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is unreferenced, and couldn't find mention of the band in any reliable sources. Seems to fail WP:BAND Jinkinson talk to me 01:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Absent notability/verifiability/reliable sourcing, I can't see them meeting the WP:GNG. The article does not so evidence of subject meeting WP:Music. This is an example of why the software should be adjusted to guide new article creators to provide sourcing as they create new articles. Presumably, they know where the info came from. Will initiate dialogue with creator if not yet done. Will evaluate sources as/if they appear. Dloh cierekim 01:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As the article was tagged for deletion 2" after creation, we can hope that at least one or two links added by the creator will prove to be to reliable sources with significant coverage. I do not know if the itunes or FM.com pages are considered that Certainly, FB, twiiter and tumblr are not. Dloh cierekim 01:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)F[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:BAND. No claims of significance or imprtance. No sources with in depth coverage. Band does not even have its own web site - which is easy enough for anybody to do these days (and free), not that this would add to notability.. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They have a facebook page, but the anti external link bot reverted. Are I tunes and FM.com RS? I'll readd as reator did not Dloh cierekim 02:44, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They do have a webpage @bandcamp. added it back Dloh cierekim 02:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.