Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calix Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 15:36, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Calix Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article is sourced entirely to company's own website; a check on Google News finds a huge number of press releases and routine coverage (stock quotes, contract executions, etc.) DocumentError (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:08, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Google News is not a good way of finding reliable sources for public companies - searching for the company name with a likely source usually works better. There was an in-depth article about the company in the Wall Street Journal in 2003 ([1]). There have also been several in-depth articles in the local Santa Rosa Press Democrat (e.g. [2] and [3]). as well as various business journals (e.g. [4]). There seems to have been a significant legal case involving the takeover of Occam by Calix, which is covered in-depth in the legal textbook "Takeovers: A Strategic Guide to Mergers and Acquisitions". -Mparrault (talk) 19:33, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are sufficient sources to indicate notability. For example, the WSJ article (above) meets the criteria for establishing notability and the company has been covered by analysts. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.