Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caliphate of ISIL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Spartaz Humbug! 08:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caliphate of ISIL[edit]

Caliphate of ISIL (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks like this could be considered a POV fork from the main Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant article. Dolescum (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, appears to just be a POV fork. ISIL is the same entity as the Caliphate of ISIL. Banak (talk) 01:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, there is plenty of room to maintain "Islamic State," the political entity that some argue is already a state and some argue is still missing one requirement or two. The Caliphate on the other hand is a religious subject about which volumes could be written. My only beef with the article as presently written is that the title makes reference to "ISIL," an entity that no longer exists. What is real is the Islamic State.XavierItzm (talk) 03:45, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Their declaration of a caliphate has been decried, as far as I am aware, unanimously by Islamic scholars, has it not? Dolescum (talk) 10:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very Strong Delete - It's completely redundant, and the article title is basically a POV name for ISIL. There's nothing actually useful in the article. Any piece of information it may contain has already been restated in many other existing ISIL articles, and as such, it should be deleted. LightandDark2000 (talk) 07:58, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:06, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, -redundant.Ekem (talk) 13:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.