Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/California Farm Water Coalition (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination per no participation herein other than from the nominator. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:14, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

California Farm Water Coalition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ineligible for PROD - de-prodded in 2009, kept at AfD in 2012.

The first PRODder's reasoning was "appears to be one of thousands of lobbying / educational groups in the state capitol", and that appears to be correct, as far as I can tell. The group's leaders are regularly quoted on water issues, but being quoted is not sufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:NORG. I have been unable to locate any in-depth independent sources that discuss the CWFC ‘’as an organization’’, in Ghits, Gnews, and Gbooks.

The article was de-prodded in 2009 with the de-prodder commenting that sources would be added ASAP, but that never happened. In the 2012 AfD, the first keep vote explicitly acknowledges that the mentions of the org are trivial, despite being numerous. Neither party added any sources to the article or responded to the nominator's request for information about sources (which, although they aren’t required to, indicates that they aren’t as available as suggested). As with the 2012 nomination, I am happy to withdraw early if sourcing is located and added but I just don’t see it. Pinging all participants from 2012: @Rorshacma:, @Cullen328:, @ThaddeusB: ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 16:16, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.