Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caitlin Ramirez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Looks like the nomination was in error. If someone wants this deleted, feel free to re-file a new AFD as soon as you want. ---J.S (T/C) 21:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Caitlin Ramirez[edit]
DO NOT DELETE - Caitlin appeared for well over a year and is Hector's daughter, so she may return. Kogsquinge 08:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What exactly is the reason for the nomination here? Wavy G 04:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Besides having no references and being written more like a journal entry? Also, "speculating for a possible return" is no reason to keep. Withholding recommendation until I am convinced one way or another: besides the sourcing issue, the key questions are "How notable is this character?" and "Is this article worth the effort to save it?" OK, people... convince me. B.Wind 21:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, but I still don't understand the nomination. No reason for deletion was given, and I don't know anything about the subject, so I can't tell if this is supposed to be hoax, or a non-notable character, or what. If the article just needs cleanup and references added, there are tags that can be put up to take care of that. Wavy G 03:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Besides having no references and being written more like a journal entry? Also, "speculating for a possible return" is no reason to keep. Withholding recommendation until I am convinced one way or another: besides the sourcing issue, the key questions are "How notable is this character?" and "Is this article worth the effort to save it?" OK, people... convince me. B.Wind 21:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete minor and non-notable fictional character, does not meet WP:FICT. Chondrite 17:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.