Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caidin Film Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:21, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caidin Film Company[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced for more than a year doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 13:52, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Neither the article nor anything I can find on searching gives indication of notability. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:45, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:33, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now obviously as there's not much for a better article with only some links at Books and browser found. SwisterTwister talk 06:53, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

related alts:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment as the topic is sourcable, perhaps there is somewhere within Wikipedia where we may at least mention it. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:05, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:59, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion. Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, whatever. In fact, it seems this page has became nothing more than a vandalism target by Caidin CDs. --189.25.225.218 (talk) 13:16, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' as per above nom and editors. Can't find anything to show it passes notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.