Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cagebird trade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aviculture. Sandstein 21:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cagebird trade[edit]

Covered better on the aviculture page. Snowman (talk) 09:33, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree. Seems to be redundant duplication from aviculture and not a notable term in itself. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect' didn't need to come here. The aviculture page needs a check for POV though,especially the lede paragraph., DGG (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, I hadn't read that before...well, I am sure no-one will object if someone closes this one early as a redirect - for the record I guess.Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to aviculture or move to Bird trade and cover all bird trade including wild bird. There should be enough material on bird trade in general including legalities, economics and conservation aspects. All articles in this cluster need care. Shyamal (talk) 12:11, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to aviculture per Casliber.Nrswanson (talk) 06:22, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.