Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 08:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cage Rage 8[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm finding no coverage beyond WP:ROUTINE fight announcements/results and the content of the article lacks "well-sourced prose, not merely a list of stats" to satisfy WP:SPORTSEVENT. TreyGeek (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reason:[reply]

I'm intentionally limited this AfD to those three articles to ensure everyone has an opportunity to find any appropriate sources and coverage I may not have found. --TreyGeek (talk) 02:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. TreyGeek (talk) 02:38, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all All of these articles consist solely of fight results, and from a second tier organization at that. There's no indication of meeting WP:SPORTSEVENT. Astudent0 (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all These are lists of fight results with nothing to show any of these events are notable or received anything other than routine sports coverage. Papaursa (talk) 21:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all - All these events fail WP:SPORTSEVENT. --LlamaAl (talk) 19:04, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all Looked at sources. Not notable.MartialArtsLEO (talk) 04:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all nomination's argument is solid against WP:SPORTSEVENT. Mkdw ^talk 02:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.