Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Café Leonar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Some sources were suggested, but the other participants didn't seem to think they were sufficient. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Café Leonar[edit]

Café Leonar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a cafe created by a single-purpose account. Notability is not demonstrated. Mccapra (talk) 12:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 12:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 12:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 12:07, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Non-notable cafe per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 18:21, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I was able to find (and add to the article) two book references supporting notability. Many of the sources found in various gSearches are in German, so evaluating those as potential sources can use a German speaker. It appears that the article has sufficient references and significant coverage enough to support keeping it per general notability. Geoff | Who, me? 18:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks Geoff. Of the two refs you added the first looks like a passing mention and there’s no preview of the second. While the cafe may well have been mentioned here and there, I don’t think these contribute much to determining notability. Mccapra (talk) 19:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Odd, Wildman's book preview is here. The Exemplarische Forschungsfelder reference, a transcript of a speech, is previewed here. Geoff | Who, me? 19:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as the sources don't seem to be enough for corpdepth, based on the ones mentioned above and the few mentions I found on top of that in a cursory google search. It is hard to argue, also, that a cafe opened in 2008 has particular cultural significance in most cases, even if catering to an interesting community. Sources would need to be extra good. 198.255.228.27 (talk) 23:20, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Passing mentions in books don't meet the criteria for WP:CORPDEPTH. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 17:53, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.