Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadet Wing Director of Operations (AFCW/DO)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to United States Air Force Academy Cadet Wing. (non-admin closure) Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cadet Wing Director of Operations (AFCW/DO)[edit]

Cadet Wing Director of Operations (AFCW/DO) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable by wikipedia standards. . All sources are the USAF Academy Slywriter (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not too sure why this article is up for deletion... not every source is from the Air Force Academy, and the content is relevant for all cadets at USAFA, grads, prospective cadets, and their families.Airportexpress (talk) 22:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Airportexpress, the dissertation, published by RAND, is the only non Air Force reference and looking at the sections where the position is mentioned does not show me that the subject is all that notable outside the halls of the Air Force Academy. Also, The AfD itself is a better place for this discussion. Slywriter (talk) 22:41, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete DO is a standard position in most Air Force organizations, and not unique to the USAFA. Not especially notable in my view. Intothatdarkness 15:06, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 14:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bold third relist for more input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 04:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.