Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadet Chronicles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cadet Chronicles[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is basically a commercial for a blog. JerrySa1 (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is WP:SELFPROMOTION because its references are not independent of the subject. It also states on its talk page, "This is the official article written for the blog and its written under the direct supervision of owners of the blog and in no way this is advertising or anything like that! This purely for the information of people visiting our blog." This suggests WP:SELFPROMOTION. KAP03 (talk) 17:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In addition, no indication this particular blog is notable. --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the same reasons as KAP03 and Lineagegeek. Moaz786 (talk to me or see what I've been doing) 16:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is pure WP:SELFPROMOTION, which is confirmed by the talk page, and has no real claims of independent notability either. Kosack (talk) 09:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SELFPROMOTION, also fails WP:GNG and WP:NWEB --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 02:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.