Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cade Foehner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Good rough consensus that there is sufficient sourcing to provide the minimal level of notability (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 09:38, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cade Foehner[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSICBIO. Only thing sourced is gossip. » Shadowowl | talk 15:32, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand. The article is poorly written, but most AI contestants will get some press if they make it past the audition stage. It seemed like the subject had only auditioned so I assumed a quick delete, but when I did a search (which we should all do WP:BEFORE nominating and !voting) I found multiple sources to support notability: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]. Even if he were to have decided the subject was not notable, we could have redirected to Gabby Barrett, with whom he is in a relationship and that has more than passing recognition: [6] [7] [8]. Combined, there's enough to assume WP:GNG. Will Shadowowl be improving the article using these sources? Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:39, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - usually top 5 or 6 on American Idol get enough media attention, as did this person, that we keep them. Past practice is that we eliminate those below the top 10 or 12, with a grey area in between. Bearian (talk) 19:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I agree with Walter Görlitz that this article does meet WP:NBIO, as shown by the links he provides. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:16, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.