Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cadbury Kid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 03:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cadbury Kid[edit]

Neologism with no evidence of widespread use and no sources. I declined speedy-ing this, but didn't feel good about it. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 13:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm the one who originally put the speedy tag on this. Sounds to me like a tag that some teenagers would give to their peers, and I felt it was just short of being an attack page. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 13:18, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definitely not an attack page. Admits it's a neologism, aserts that it is becoming "more and more" popular with teenagers, and then explains the condition of being "cadbury". In effect, this is a slang term for "a bit tipsy", and really belongs on Urban Dictionary - not here on Wikipedia. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 16:23, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Let me rephrase this. I re-read it, and it basically says tht it takes less booze for somebody to get drunk. This, my friends, is what is known as a "lightweight". --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 21:43, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No reliable sources and this is suspicious for something that claims to be so widespread. I suspect it's a local protologism that someone's attempting to foist on us. Accounting4Taste:talk 03:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete The article admits it is a neologism and nonsense. Its clearly unverifiable and is written in an extremely unencyclopedic tone, full of weasel words and obvious nonsense. The IP that created the article is also inserting links to it in other articles: appears to be an effort to introduce something made up in school. Gwernol 14:13, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nonnotable neologism. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:37, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.