Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CactusSoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:13, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CactusSoft[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are just mentions on lists of derived from company sites DGG ( talk ) 16:27, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cactussoft page does't differ from other belarusian software companies pages. Take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belitsoft — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eva-loran (talk • contribs) 08:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC) — Eva-loran (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete as entirely PR, from the clients to the verification and awards, the fact there's no substance and this is then advertorial is altogether overwhelmingly enough for delete. SwisterTwister talk 09:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete standard searches did not reveal enough independent coverage in reliable sources to meet company notability threshold. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 17:48, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- an unremarkable software company. Independent coverage is not there to meet GNG and COPRDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No independent coverage or RS. -- Dane2007 ^talk 19:23, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.