Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cacoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cacoo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or other notability criteria Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:59, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - software article of unclear notability lacking sufficient reliable sourcing. The NYTimes and Mashable refs in the article are incidental mentions, and the TechCrunch article is not sufficient on its own. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 04:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.