Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cabury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cabury[edit]

Don't know if it's a real person, certainly doubtful if he is notable, googling 'cadbury Harold Earl Wessex godwin godfrey' yielded these results, none seem to be about the person i question. By the way, it seems to be a typo in the article title, since the text refers to "Cadbury" - Akamad 09:53, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the creator did not appear to check the spelling. Jtmichcock 12:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure that's a criterion for deletion. More to the point, the contributor appears to be quite aware of the issue, since he's added the same "historical" figure to Cadbury itself. Maybe he thought this was an appropriate way to handle the fact that Cadbury already existed? — Haeleth Talk
Delete Trivial at best. PJM 12:43, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The name Cadbury although derived from an Anglo-Saxon name, is an English derivative of Anglo-Saxon and thus not contemporary for the 11th century. That alone proves this is bollocks. -- Francs 2000 12:45, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as hoax. Not only is it not an 11th-century form of the word, but "Cadbury" is a place-name, not a personal name, as the "-bury" suffix makes amply clear... — Haeleth Talk 18:09, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.