Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CTV2 (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Thanks to Tim, who added sources and even made a !delete vote change thanks to that. There is no really consensus to delete, and the main point of the nominator'sthat it did not get substantial coverage. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CTV2 (album)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One review worthy of the name, no other substantial coverage, no charting (not sure if mixtapes "chart" anyway - search me). Appears not to fulfill WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:21, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:34, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:34, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If album is not notable, then redirect. The page serves a purpose by directing users to the artist's article. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:05, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

But the album isn't called CTV2 - unless it's commonly known as that, the value of a redirect is minimal. Richard3120 (talk) 18:44, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Then move the page to Cool Tape Vol. 2, or create Cool Tape Vol. 2 and keep both as redirects. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 20:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)~~[reply]

Update: I've redirected Cool Tape Vol. 2 to Jaden Smith. I still think keeping CTV2 (album) as a redirect is helpful to users who may search by this title. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:31, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability, and the only source that appears to refer to the subject by this name is Genius which is not reliable. Keep, more sources have been found _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:32, 22 November 2018 (UTC) 18:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 12:42, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - per good and minor coverage in Billboard [[1]], Vibe [[2]], MTV [[3]], Complex [[4]], Spin [[5]] and Hollywood Life [[6]]. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per the multiple reliable sources coverage identified in the last post, passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 17:19, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.