Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSAM Health

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CSAM Health[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article makes no claim to notability. Google searches return plenty press release driven publicity, but not much else. The recent edits by 382C include removing the notability tag but they've not provided an edit summary so no justification has been given. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 21:58, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The 2005 article from Businessweek discusses a Rikshospitalet project implementation and mentions a "CSAM International" company being spun-out. When the WP:SPA CSAM's original article was accepted at AfC it also had another 3rd party reference, a now-gone E24 item, though that appears only to have been routine coverage about periodic financial results. Since then despite maintenance edits by a couple of further WP:SPA accounts, the article quality has not improved. Passing press mentions [1] confirm it as a company going about its business, but searches are not finding the substantial coverage needed for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:48, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough indi 2ndary sources + routine coverage fails CORPDEPTH. Widefox; talk 17:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.