Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CPL Software Labs

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A7. SoWhy 08:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CPL Software Labs[edit]

CPL Software Labs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement of a Non-notable company. Lack of independent reliable Resources. fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP DMySon 09:55, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Note that we also have the Draft:CPL Software Labs which was rejected at AfC, as well as reference to something I haven't seen before, a freestanding Wikidata item which at one point had a promotionally worded Description. AllyD (talk) 14:01, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (possible CSD A7): An article about a software company, created by a WP:SPA and IPs. The only external links are to their Weebly page (misspelt), Github and Wikidata, none of which are reliable sources. No evidence of attained notability provided or found. AllyD (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.