Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CORPS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Computerjoe 's talk 18:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CORPS[edit]

Neutral bump from speedy. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-22 04:44Z

Delete - no assertion of notability, unreferenced. MER-C 05:12, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Corps. Danny Lilithborne 05:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep CORPS is still available as an RPG, and was part of the history that contributed to EABA. It is known among the RPG community. I will add some references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allegrorondo (talk • contribs)
Delete per MER-C. I also note that the only the lead section is about CORPS. Percy Snoodle 14:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Real RPG, existing product. Article could use a rewrite, but at worst, disambig with a redirect to Blacksburg Tactical Research Center. FrozenPurpleCube 15:32, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per MER-C.--Shella * 18:17, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- I see no reason to remove this article. CORPS is still available for sale and sees actual play. It is notable in the progression of RPG design and as a current factor in RPG play. -- Joshua BishopRoby 18:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this was not as influential as GURPS but is notable within gaming. Article could use more 3rd-party references. --Dhartung | Talk 03:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.