Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/COMETA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 00:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COMETA[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no reliable sources discussing such an organization. It may have existed, but it does not seem to meet notability requirements. LuckyLouie (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete - My concern is that the article lists a number of possibly living persons as being the author of a UFO tract without valid sources. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - With no prejudice against creation of a redirect to Ufology#COMETA or another appropriate location. I see this as similar to Disclosure Project. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disclosure Project. jps (talk) 02:08, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per QTxVi4bEMRbrNqOorWBV (talk · contribs). Barney the barney barney (talk) 16:02, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.