Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CO2 Australia Limited

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. JForget 22:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CO2 Australia Limited[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per WP:COMPANY. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (Discussion) 08:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and how about doing the article's writer the courtesy of a nomination statement in English ? Looking here I can see quite a lot of news articles on the group and about 180+ articles in google news archives that at least mention them. perhaps the article is under the wrong name (should be CO2 Group) but I cannot see what the problem is. Appears to be ample reliable, independant sources talking about the company - Peripitus (Talk) 11:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep lots of coverage. [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable enough, article just needs some work. - Shiftchange (talk) 09:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

To everyone who has discussed this article - thank you kindly for deciding to keep CO2 Australia in Wikipedia. I have since added some references and willing to continue working on the article so it meets your requirements and standards. With thanks, Kimberley. 7 December 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKimberleyL (talk • contribs) 03:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]