Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CO2 Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:43, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CO2 Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Puff piece, poorly sourced (one of the references listed is the article [[Carbon neutrality]]; seriously?), mostly written by a single-purpose account. Notability somewhat doubtful. Has maintenance tags dating to 2009. Please WP:BLOWITUP. —Keφr 10:39, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 13:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as my searches found some results but nothing convincing of better improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.