Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CNS Ayurveda Chikitsalayam & Research Center
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete both. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:07, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
CNS Ayurveda Chikitsalayam & Research Center[edit]
- CNS Ayurveda Chikitsalayam & Research Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Two nearly-identical articles about the same non-notable ayurvedic hospital. No independent reliable sources found. A somewhat more detailed article about the founder of the hospital, written by the same author, is currently at AfD; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chatharu Nair. MelanieN (talk) 16:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the related page CNS Ayurveda Chikitsalayam, another stub article about the same clinic. --MelanieN (talk) 17:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MelanieN (talk) 17:05, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete These fail WP:GNG, WP:ORG - searching reveals no evidence of notability. -- Scray (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Lack of significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Fails all notability guidelines. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 01:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails GNG. No assertion of notability. – Richard BB 13:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage in RS. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Amartyabag TALK2ME 05:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.