Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLEAR Framework for Enterprise Architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CLEAR Framework for Enterprise Architecture[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article describes a non-notable framework with no verifiable sources Nickmalik (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:30, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Follow-up note - I have made an effort to find reliable sources for this article, through Google Books and various search engines including the one at Atos. I could not find a single source that references this topic, not even from an author. With all due respect, there is no evidence other than the image uploaded to Wikipedia that the framework actually ever existed. While I believe that it did exist at some time in the past, it falls below the bar for notability and inclusion in Wikipedia. Nickmalik (talk) 06:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As per Nickmalik I have not managed to find references for this framework, including at TOGAF's site whose past editions listed other notable frameworks. As things stand this fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 05:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unreferenced. gets 1 line mentions in a mere 10 gbooks hits. LibStar (talk) 03:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.