Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK Morgan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 14:39, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CK Morgan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was already deleted in January after an AFD discussion, but was now recreated. I don't know if the new article is "substantially different" from the deleted one, so I don't want to use speedy deletion. The main problem seams to be the Notability. Sources are poor, not reliable, not independent. The author is probably the subject himself (WP:Autobiography). The photo in the article (File:Ck Morgan (Golden).jpg) is uploader's "own work", and since I can't find it anywhere on the web, my conclusion is that the uploader is CK Morgan himself. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:45, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete seems promotional and there just isn't that much coverage in reliable independent sources. Indicative is the blank bio at MTV (or is my Internet acting up again?). --Bejnar (talk) 20:51, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The current version is better referenced than the deleted version, and appears to have some added material, but it's hard to tell because there was a lot of editing going on before the deletion. This sockpuppet investigation indicates that there was a problem with unreferenced additions to the article, and that it was also recreated at a couple of other titles. I'm reluctant to offer an opinion on notability because I do see some Ghanaian media sources referenced; he doesn't appear to meet the specific notability standards for musicians but he might meet WP:GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:03, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a few more Ghanaian hits in this edit, but I don't see reliable sources there or anywhere else. Drmies (talk) 03:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
dont delete i dont think this page should be deleted as they are other artist who only have two references but their wikipedia is still there,im not even done with this page theres a lot of more articles i have found that i want to add if i get the chance to add them but if theres anyway anyone could help to improve this article would be epic too unsigned, but added by Upcloseandpersonal2 talk, 03:27, 21 July 2014‎ UTC— Upcloseandpersonal2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF as to why this type of argument is not apprpriate in deletion discussions. --Bejnar (talk) 06:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. What, again? Same promotional article, same creator, same non-notable subject, same waste of time for everyone. Coretheapple (talk) 19:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.