Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Environmental, Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CJ Environmental, Inc.[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, cited only to its own websites and a press release. Speedy deletion declined, no reason given. I can't find any general, secondary coverage about this company or any reason to believe it is notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Sionk (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find a single legitimate news article concerning this company. If the only way we know about it is from their own press releases, I don't see an issue deleting it. ThadeusOfNazereth (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 11:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sourcing, clearly fails WP:NCORP. TastyPoutine ^{talk (if you dare)} 12:04, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There is an advertorial-type Q&A from The Boston Globe in 2014 ([1] – via HighBeam (subscription required) ), but neither that nor anything else provided or found appears sufficient to demonstrate this to be more than a company going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 14:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.