Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CINTAX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. JERRY ^talk _contribs 02:35, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CINTAX[edit]

Non-notable, unreferenced, self-promotion Lumberjake (talk) 06:20, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~written~~ sounds like an advertisement. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 16:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I wrote it for informative purpose and have no reason to 'promote' or 'advertise' it. 2000 google hits for widespread of CINTAX in the context of taxes.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:47, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -I could go either way. Weak keep or weak delete. I have not heard of it from the side of Taxation but I'm not that familiar with International Tax Preparation, not sure how it falls under the Software area. Morphh ^(talk) 1:06, 04 February 2008 (UTC)
Comment. I used this software while I was studying in the USA, and I think it is well-known within its niche (international students and scholars). Whether this has been enough to catch the attention of relevant secondary sources to establish notability, I don't know, but it seems possible. --Itub (talk) 15:38, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salix alba (talk) 14:02, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I did a Google search to see what's out there. I find a lot of colleges with pages telling non-residents how to use CINTAX to file their US tax returns, but I can't find any commentary/news coverage of the product. However, I'll grant that the breadth of coverage, plus the fact that some major schools have pages about it, is enough to verify that it exists and is notable as described. —C.Fred (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.