Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CEVA Logistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CEVA Logistics[edit]

CEVA Logistics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company fails WP:ORG and WP:CORPDEPTH. I find brief mentions, routine announcements, and industry publications but nothing in-depth that can establish notability. CNMall41 (talk) 08:35, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Concur with nominator. DonFB (talk) 09:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 02:55, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as clear advertising in which only published and republished advertising by the company has been cited, simply because other Wikis are still hosting this is never a convincing sign because we're the highly advanced one of them all especially given how we won't tolerate any advertising at any costs so that actually sets us as an example; anything that is as business-focused as this one is, is not acceptable. SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I PRODded the thing in July 2015[1] as WP:CORP fail. It hasn't improved since then. Brianhe (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.