Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CDVU+

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR Mark Arsten (talk) 03:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CDVU+[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, written like an advertisement, and misleading (it is not a “technology”; it is simply a series of regular enhanced CDs) ï¿½ (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 31. Snotbot t • c » 12:42, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems notable per Geek.com, Reuters, Engadget, IT Media (Japanese), and Gizmodo. I've removed most of the promotional material. --Cerebellum (talk) 02:22, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Still, it is not a “technology”. From the Gizmodo article you linked: You know what I hate? When marketing innovations are disguised as new technologies. ï¿½ (talk) 13:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. I've edited the article to remove the bit about being a technology. --Cerebellum (talk) 19:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.