Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CAT:TEMP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily redirected per discussion to the restored, deprecated category (without prejudice to RFD, but I continue to maintain that because CAT:TEMP is linked in so many deletion log actions, it should be kept in some form to provide explanation to users seeking one). –xeno^talk 18:48, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CAT:TEMP[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-article in the article namespace. I tried to speedy it, but User:Xeno rejected. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 18:17, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - First, see Wikipedia:Pseudo-namespaces. Second, CAT:TEMP formerly redirected to Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages, and was linked countless times in deletion logs. The former category provided an explanation of the deletion; it has since been deleted, which is why an explanation is provided at the page in the "pseudo-namespace". An alternative would be to restore the category, tag it as deprecated, and redirect CAT:TEMP back there. –xeno^talk 18:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting to the category would be the only viable option. Just because it was linked countless times in deletion logs does not mean it should be kept. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 18:30, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored the target, can we close this AfD and redirect? –xeno^talk 18:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs/editor review)}~ 18:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.