Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Glenn Richardson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:37, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

C. Glenn Richardson[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Major puff piece article, written by man himself, i.e. COI issue and SPA account holder. Can't see why he is notable. Fails WP:BIO. scope_creep (talk) 11:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He merits a brief mention in Haeger Potteries, I'd say. But despite his accomplishments he does seem to fall well short of our requirements for independent notability. Support Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete I removed one of the refs that turned out to be bogus: an event listing claiming to be much more. There is too much puffery here. Another ref cited in the article has only a sentence or two on him. google books returns nothing. Ergo: does not meet notability requirements via published sources. 96.127.243.41 (talk) 20:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.