Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C.J. Fusco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

C.J. Fusco[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding any book reviews or anything on Google Scholar. Fails WP:NACADEMIC WP:NAUTHOR. Run-of-the-mill person. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 20:13, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:54, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The book "Our Orwell, Right or Left" is held by 740 libraries: [1]. The 43 library holdings of the book "Old Ghosts of New England" [2] make a total of 783. Coverage in the Hartford Courant newspaper: [3]. James500 (talk) 03:29, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:59, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg jhp jm 02:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Fusco also appears to be a teacher and cross country and track coach at Avon High School. [4] [5] There's some local coverage of him for this but IDK if it is enough for notability. [6] [7] Also note this review of one of his books.IntoThinAir (talk) 17:16, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete No doubt his book on Orwell is in lots of libraries, but I don't think that meets any notability standards. Google scholar saws it's only cited 5 times and that's not enough to meet WP:NPROF or WP:NAUTHOR. The only sources are from his publishers and being a high school English teacher and track coach doesn't show notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandals1 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. My own searching is turning up no WP:RS. The two references in the article are 404's. No indication in the article that he did anything noteworthy. The reiview found by IntoThinAir doesn't excite me much; it's one paragraph in a column of multiple reviews, by a New England centric publication, covering, a new bumper crop of books about our region, which makes it WP:ROUTINE. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:40, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I opened all the refs provided above and didn't find anything that satisfied WP:N. Szzuk (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.