Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byron Nemeth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Byron Nemeth[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSICIAN Theroadislong (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on [1]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The promotional language can be fixed. But the lack of evidence of notability can't, as far as I can tell. Maproom (talk) 16:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He's been plugging away for many years with a lot of albums, but unless he got into hardcopy books early in his career, he has practically no reliable media coverage. Various activities and releases have been noted by other musicians in social media chatter, and he has some self-promotions, but he will have to be happy as a behind-the-scenes journeyman. This WP article is clearly an attempted promotion to generate session work, and probably copied from his own websites and social media pages. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:06, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - We should check for hardcopies and print sources first before coming to a consensus, just to be sure. This is because a lot of the previous comments have pointed to lack of internet sources, but the subject was performing before the popularization of the internet. There could very well be newspaper coverage or the like that didn't make its way to the web. Tyrone Madera (talk) 22:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.