Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bwimb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Elemental (Dungeons & Dragons). (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bwimb[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not establish notability. TTN (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete original research based on fictional sources. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge to Elemental (Dungeons & Dragons). BOZ (talk) 23:08, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per BOZ. Contra Stasek Lem, WP:ATD-M prefers a merge for non-notable content (the assertion that it is OR seems curious; it's more like regurgiated primary sources) rather than outright deletion. Jclemens (talk) 05:08, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. The sources are real, the content is fictional. Josh Milburn (talk) 12:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.