Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buzz (Korean band)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 15:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Buzz (Korean band)[edit]

Buzz (Korean band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSIC, has no references and the external links are either dead or to a video broadcast. No indication of Notability and there appear to be a number of BLP issues in the Personal Life section. Disbanded as of 2014. Karst (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:27, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:28, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:56, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This was a major band in Korea back in the day, a mere ten years ago or so.[1][2][3] Claimsworth (talk) 06:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Perhaps, unfortunately, none of the sources indicate this at the moment. Of greater concern would be the BLP issues. If there are more sources (not mere announcements of a reunion) then that would help. Karst (talk) 12:24, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Claimsworth. This is one of the biggest Korean bands, more so than a number of others out there. In my opinion, the article is in a better position than the Korean version as far as sourcing goes. This article has been here for a long time. You can use the Wayback Machine to verify the links, and as with the links that Claimsworth provided, this band is notable. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 00:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.