Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butt-load

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft redirect to Wiktionary. (non-admin closure) Sceptre ^(talk) 20:00, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Butt-load[edit]

Non-notable term, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. G W… 14:18, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hoax/vandalism, tagging for speedy deletion. TrulyBlue (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The current content is pure WP:BOLLOCKS but this is a possible search term so we should have something here; probably a link to wiktionary. In fact, I think I'll do that now.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 14:35, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

*Note: I cut unreferenced content per WP:BURDEN and replaced the article with a link to Wiktionary at this point in the debate.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 14:41, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soft redirect to Wiktionary as per S Marshall. I've updated the redirect to reflect this. Cycle~ (talk) 15:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I'll make a note of that template for future reference.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 15:16, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a soft redirect to wiktionary. LinguistAtLarge • Msg 18:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.