Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bushclosure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 11:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bushclosure[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page is filled with original research. The fact that there are sources does not mean that it is not original research. A google search for bushclosure reveals few results other than a comment on a news post on this page http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/GoBarbara/joe-miller-health-care-federal-government_n_755188_63068120.html. I believe this violates WP:ONEDAY and WP:OR Ryan Vesey (talk) 16:36, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the title enjoyed popular usage, I'd suggest redirecting to Economic policy of the George W. Bush administration. But it doesn't. 99.149.87.151 (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable neologism. I don't see where any of the cited sources use this neologism. The term gets hardly any Google hits, and almost half of those are from Wikipedia itself. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is an essay-like biased article, failing WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NPOV. –Dream out loud (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – nn neologism and repackaging of existing material unrelated to term. ttonyb (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:33, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Can't find anything to even begin to source the article.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 20:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.