Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burr DeBenning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 12:02, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Burr DeBenning[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor. Article was created by a long since banned user who created dozens of articles that fall short of the GNG. Ridernyc (talk) 20:11, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and speedy close. Quite obviously meets NACTOR requirements, and the cursory cookie-cutter nomination provides no basis for concluding otherwise. That the original creator started some number of deletable articles is no reason for summarily deleting everything he put his hands on. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep To me the subject seems to pass WP:GNG and WP:ENT. --Jersey92 (talk) 01:11, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He seems to meet WP:NACTOR and there are at least a couple RSes about him [1] Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 01:54, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.