Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burj (word)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck (talk) 05:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Burj (word)[edit]

Permastub of non-notable topic that just contains a definition with no sources. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Equazcion •✗/C • 00:50, 29 Jan 2008 (UTC) 00:50, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and restore definition to intro of Burj dab page -- although perhaps a shorter definition there would be in order. -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral but inclined to delete. I created this article so that I could clean the dab Burj; the info didn't seem to belong on the dab page and was, in any event, uncited but I was loath to lose it just in case ... I guess, on balance, my vote would be to delete it altogether and not transfer back to Burj because it wouldn't lead to an article, but I am pretty easy either way. Abtract (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and restore definition, without unsourced etymological speculation, to Burj. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 12:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:BIAS does not trump WP:WINAD.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor a Thesaurus. The definition should be restored to Burj. Rsazevedo ^msg 23:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.