Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunko Kanazawa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bunko Kanazawa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. Being "called 'one of the biggest AV idols' " by a nn website jmate.com is an insufficient claim of significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Very well known Japanese porn star (the only one I've ever heard of tbh). Dozens of references already in the article. Very odd nomination. Tigerboy1966 19:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The only one you've heard of" isn't a valid reason for keeping, Again there being dozens of references also isn't a valid for keeping, Very odd !vote. –Davey2010^Talk 20:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Famous for many years; no reason for this...Modernist (talk) 09:57, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:ITSFAMOUS, one of the arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:41, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 20:32, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep Why are we even discussing if this should be deleted? Bunko Kanazawa was famous in the 90s and early 2000s. Are there any East Asian contributors assessing this? Just because her achievements are relatively unknown in the West is surely not cause for deletion, especially if you base the requirements in the context of the Western pornographic industry, e.g. there is no "Pornographic Hall of Fame" in Japan. Madoka Ozawa is another star whose page should not have been deleted and should be reinstated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.90.50.104 (talk) 18:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One of the cited reasons for deletion is "no evidence of notability, hasn't won any notable/signifcant awards". However, in the List of Japanese adult video awards (1991–2008) article, it is clearly stated that "Although pornography in Japan has a long history and is a major business, until recently, the adult video industry did not develop a broad-based set of awards for sales or performance such as the AVN Awards in American pornography." This measure of notability is therefore unrealistic as AV actresses like Bunko Kanazawa and Madoka Ozawa could not have won any notable awards as such awards did not exist during their heyday in the mid-to-late 90s and early 2000s. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.90.50.104 (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 05:03, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kostas20142 (talk) 11:54, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.