Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bundying (sexual)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as a {{db-repost}} of deleted material. (aeropagitica) 10:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bundying (sexual)[edit]

Delete as obvious WP:NEO, WP:NFT, possibly some sort of WP:COI page. Blatantly fails WP:RS. Not even worth wasting the time bringing it to AfD, but I can't find an appropriate speedy criterion, and it's a contested PROD, so here we are. --Kinu ^t/_c 08:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per above. Gzkn 08:07, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as {{db-bio}} or {{db-attack}}, it's just a made up in school article about some guy on a hockey team. -- IslaySolomon | talk 08:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per nom. Utter nonsense, unsubstantiated and just plain complete WP:BOLLOCKS. MartinDK 08:17, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as per G1. Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. --Dennisthe2 09:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Salt article - checking user info for the creator and his talk page (user is user:Chris01720, he's been prone to recreating the article. Should probably be salted. --Dennisthe2 09:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete and salt the earth if necessary. --Calton | Talk 09:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.