Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buncombe (term)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge to Bunkum. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 12:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buncombe (term)[edit]

Dicdef. Attempted prod; Monicasdude removed prod as "etymology/history is not dicdef". I believe the article is still more or less a dictionary definition, and can't go much beyond one. Zetawoof^(ζ) 06:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or transwiki to Wiktionary (if there isn't already a definition there) per my nom. Zetawoof^(ζ) 06:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Transwiki~~ Merge to Wiktionary:Bunkum. Fe e zo (Talk) 06:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We already have an article on Bunkum which is the relevant term but which lacks references. We should merge this referenced article with the better known term. Capitalistroadster 06:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Capitalistroadster, since I just came to exactly the same conclusion independently :-) Just zis Guy you know? 10:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Capitalistroadster. --Ter e nc e Ong 13:43, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.