Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgaria–Colombia relations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 09:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bulgaria–Colombia relations[edit]
- Bulgaria–Colombia relations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Random bilateral pairing; not inherently notable (see e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaysia–Serbia relations). No additional material to indicate notability. Biruitorul Talk 04:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't meet WP:N Nick-D (talk) 05:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, they do not even have embassies in each others' countries. Punkmorten (talk) 07:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. -- I'mperator 12:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As noted, the two nations do not even have embassies. In looking over the talk page of the user who created the article, he/she was identified as a sockpuppet of the more famous of the creators of these articles. If a ban is ever applied to an editor (and I must emphasize that this has not happened yet), then WP:SPEEDY at G5 would apply to any suspect articles created after a ban took effect. Mandsford (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't meet WP:N. No embassies. The ELs are just points of contact. I couldn't find news articles, discussions in books, or corresponding articles in the Spanish or Bulgarian wikipedias. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the fact that they have relations does not assert notability. There isn't even any embassies to represent each other... Tavix | Talk 17:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of notability. This sure seems like indiscriminate information. Drmies (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no reliable sources exist to establish notability for this topic. The relevant "Foreigion relations of" articles are a target if anything happens encyclopedic in future.Bali ultimate (talk) 17:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is hardly any relationship between these countries. -Marcusmax(speak) 19:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete C'mon, Bulgaria and Colombia? What do these two countries have in common? Not even an attempt at notability or history or historical context compared to other random pairs of countries (though few others seem as random as these two!). Simply not notable. --BlueSquadronRaven 20:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone finds something, which i rather doubt they will. Not snow, though, in order to give a chance for it in the 7 days. DGG (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.